Shocking Video Split-Test Results Prove Most Marketers
Are Going About Many Aspects Of Their Business All Wrong…
And 2 Simple Business Tweaks You Can Make Right Now To
Seize The Gobs Of Extra Cash You’re Currently Leaving On The Table!
This may come as a surprise to you…
Over the past week we’ve been conducting a top-secret video split test on this blog.
None of our readers knew about the test. Yet, for many the results will create a serious degree of discomfort. Probably for you as well…
Why will the results of our secret video split test cause you discomfort?
Because if I write this post correctly, it’s going to force you to look at how you approach your current business activities, and face this cold, hard truth: Your current approach is possibly leaving a ton of extra money and opportunity on the table.
A blunt statement, perhaps… but one I’ll back up as you read on…
Listen, if you want to reap maximum financial and business-growth rewards from your efforts, and achieve founder-status in your business (i.e. build a business that grows, thrives and “gets better” without you) you simply must be able to do two critical things:
But I’m jumping way ahead of myself here.
So let me tell you about our secret split test, the logic behind it, the surprising results it delivered, our readers polarized reactions, and what it should mean to you about growing your business rapidly to the point of absolute freedom.
Over the past two weeks, Todd Brown (the marketing wiz at Strategic Profits) and I have been delivering advice (on this blog) about what you need to do to make the shift from typical, average entrepreneur to autonomous business Founder.
And, to reiterate, by Founder we mean: an entrepreneur who has complete and total financial and time freedom from their business. And, an entrepreneur who has a business that has been engineered to grow, thrive and improve without the necessary direct input or involvement from the entrepreneur.
In other words, as a Founder you’ll be an entrepreneur with a business where you have no day-to-day responsibilities, and even better, your business will continue to grow and make you more and more money without your direct involvement – the ultimate entrepreneurial nirvana.
Well, Todd and I started our series on “Becoming A Founder” with a video (from my favorite cigar lounge) that received rave reviews and many AHA! Moments.
In fact, that first video – located here http://www.strategicprofits.com/strategy/new-video-how-to-get-complete-personal-financial-freedom-from-your-business/
- already has 344 comments and has been retweeted well over 135 times.
We recorded this video the day before I finished-up the, now infamous, Billy Mays Marketing Magic mega-blog post. And, then we released the video the day after the Billy Mays post went up on the blog.
This is a critical point in this lesson and story because it was the Billy Mays blog post that inspired the secret split test I’m going to tell you about in a second.
Well, when it was time to shoot our second Founder video, it seemed obvious to Todd and I that we should put the golden nuggets we learned from Billy Mays to the test.
So, together we hatched our top-secret plan to see just how it would impact our opt-in conversions if I “channeled” a little Billy Mays in our next Founder video.
And, that’s exactly what I did…
We created two different versions of our second video in our Founder series.
However, my message was the same in both videos. Even the call to action was the same: “Opt-in for more great advice on how you can become a Founder”.
The difference:
Version A took almost everything I wrote about in the Billy Mays blog post and applied it:
Version B was my normal approach to delivering advice through video:
So, while the content was identical – the approach taken was obviously dramatically different between the two. And, the variation in response was equally as different.
Funny thing is… many of the comments about video A weren’t even based on the content presented in the video, but on the style of delivery. Many marketers seemed to freak-out over my change in style.
For example:
Jesse said “What happened to Rich’s voice… Not believable at all.”
John said “I know that you’re pitching in this video… I twinged at hearing you at such a high pitch. ”
Tom agreed “…Rich, you have a persona, a relaxed, calm, and cool persona – this is what attracted me to you. Change that and you will alienate a big chunk of people…”
Cory challenged “I know you have passion for Billy Mays… However, I not real sure if changing your approach to sort-of mimic his style is going to be beneficial for you since you already built what Seth Godin refers to as “Your Tribe” Rich.”
Another commentor said this “In other words you need to be YOU accomplishing the same objectives rather than trying to recreate a persona… . Unfortunately, your particular take on his style detracted from your message… Obviously your readers believe you are authentic. So keep your authenticity and accomplish your objective Rich’s way.”
Matt said “Trying to push yourself into another mold will fail… ”
An anonymous poster said this “Rich has sold his soul to the devil.”
Now, the average online marketer would think, with the volume of negative comments and feedback from our loyal tribe of followers, students, and readers –that version B (my normal delivery) would blow away version A (my “infomercial-style” delivery) in opt-in conversions.
I mean… let’s face it… if one video gets lots of negative comments and another one with the same content doesn’t get any negative comments… it should seem logical, right, to see a decrease in opt-ins from the video with the negative comments.
But guess what?
If, like most of the average marketers out there, you assumed the same thing, you’d be DEAD WRONG!
Not only did the “informercial-style” video with the negative comments beat my normal delivery. It CRUSHED IT! It blew it out of the water!
Version A (Billy May’s Style) outperformed Version B (Normal Style) by a whopping 42%!
In other words, Version A – despite all of the negative comments – generated 42% MORE opt-ins than the video with my normal delivery.
Who would have thought, right?
Now to be fair – some readers congratulated me on my willingness to step outside my comfort zone and do something different. But, NO ONE thought we would get better results with the “infomercial-style”. NOT A SINGLE ONE!
Yet, what most assumed would get killed, actually did the slaughtering. This is why assumptions in marketing and business-development have no place.
This is also why the most advanced marketers often answer hypothetical marketing questions with the caveat: “To truly determine which is better you need to test it…”
Now, frankly, I could end this blog post right here and still have delivered major takeways for you. You did get those takeaways, right? If not, you may want to back a re-read the beginning of this post. J
But there’s so much more to glean from the results of this video split-test. In fact, there’s 2 critical lessons buried in this story that can help you quickly get on the path to becoming a Founder, of all things, in your own business.
So, if you’re really serious about wanting to have a business that delivers the financial freedom you desire… with absolutely no day-to-day responsibilities… keep reading.
Because I’m about to share with you 2 simple tweaks you must make in how you function everyday, if you truly want that personal and business freedom.
There no doubt in my mind…
The average internet marketer that read my Billy Mays Marketing Magic blog post, got to the end, and felt it was a good (or possibly even great) because they learned quite a bit about the secret psychology and sales strategies behind Billy Mays’ billion-dollar infomercial empire.
But – truth be told, they really didn’t learn a damn thing.
Why do I say that?
Because in the end; their newfound knowledge doesn’t translate into any sort of change in their business or personal actions.
Sure, they absorbed the information they’ve read in that post. But, when it comes time for them to create a new video, most marketers will do the same exact thing they’ve done every other time before. They won’t change anything in the slightest.
The result for them?
Nothing changes. Their results don’t change. Their business doesn’t change. Their income doesn’t change. Their lifestyle doesn’t change. Their level of freedom doesn’t change. Nothing changes. Even with new knowledge, everything goes on like it did before. So, where is the learning there??
Meanwhile, these “ever-learning, never-evolving entrepreneurs” continue to ask themselves, “What do I need to change to get better results?”. Sadly, they don’t realize they’ve already been shown the answer. Yet, they were simply unwilling to experiment and put their new knowledge to the test.
Listen: you learn, evolve, grow, and develop into a founder BY DOING… not by just absorbing new information. Period.
Your willingness to do – creates your ability to do – and nothing else does. This is why true learning comes from the application of your new knowledge, not just the acquisition of it.
And you evolve and grow as a marketer and entrepreneur by stretching yourself and getting out of your comfort zone. Plain and simple: as an entrepreneur none of your marketing or business-building decisions should ever be made based on your level of comfort.
In fact, I would go as far as to say that thing you’re most uncomfortable with is probably THE thing you should be doing to grow to the next level. Never forget that.
For instance:
Making video version A wasn’t easy or comfortable for me. How could it be – version B is my normal style.
But how could I have studied everything that made Billy Mays’ delivery-style so effective and not test that style against my own normal delivery method? Doing that would have done a massive disservice to Strategic Profits and my personal growth and evolution as a marketer.
Truth be told – I couldn’t NOT test my new knowledge of Billy Mays. And my hope for you is that you’re either the same way already or that I can help you evolve to that point where you’re always putting your new knowledge into action.
Here’s why: If your not progressing daily toward the reality of your dream business and lifestyle, it’s because you’ve trained yourself to honor your comfort zone more than your dreams.
Just to be clear – your comfort zone encompasses all of the things you’ve done often enough so you feel extremely comfortable doing them again (i.e. video version B, in my case).
The reality is that the feelings and activities most of us label as “uncomfortable” are, in fact, the very tools necessary to fulfill our dreams.
Frankly, average entrepreneurs often treat their business as if it were a bicycle with training wheels still in place – limited, entirely too safe, and somewhat boring.
They believe that “being comfortable” is reason enough not to do something new, or worse yet, to let “what other people might think” affect their behavior.
Please understand: taking calculated risks or playing it safe is totally your choice. It’s always your choice. And you will always live out the choices you make.
Founders understand when, where and how to take calculated risks with their new knowledge. And, then they do.
So, the bottom line question for you is this: Are you going to take the proper calculated risks, like Founders do, to pursue what you truly want or are you going to continue to do what’s comfortable?
Here’s the deal: to become the Founder of a business – one that grows and grows without you and gives you total freedom and autonomy – you need to evolve from the entrepreneur you are right now to the Founder you can be.
Founders understand that success is a journey, not a destination. And, they understand how, when and where along that journey to take calculated risks that get them out of their comfort zone.
Unlike average entrepreneurs, Founders are almost always on the cutting-edge of something new and big– a breakthrough, a discovery, a game-changing business distinction.
How do Founders stay on the cutting-edge and always one-step ahead of average entrepreneurs?
Well, Founders possess the skillsets necessary to spot and seize upcoming opportunities and trends early in their market. Founders have a specific method for identifying and calculating the risks that are most likely to produce the results needed to move their companies forward everyday. And, Founders know how to decipher between the myriad of tactics and strategies that will allow their businesses to continue to evolve and prosper.
All of these things combined… and this is exactly why Founders are the entrepreneurs living life on their own terms, by their own rules.
Then I invite you to enter your name and primary email address below to gain access to the rest of the FREE Founders Video Series. As soon as you do, you’ll instantly become part of a group of thousands of entrepreneurs all at the beginning of, what will be, a fun and fantastic transformation into a true business Founder.
P.S. Have you recently reaped the rewards of getting out of your comfort zone? Or, have you been struggling with doing something to grow your business you’re uncomfortable with? If so, why not join the conversation by sharing your experience below. We’d love to hear from you. Leave us your comment below.
Link to this post: If you found this page useful, consider linking to Secret Video Split Test Proves Most Marketers DEAD WRONG! ...
I learnt two things today.
First thing was the new post on John Carlton`s blog. He answered the question “why long copy always outsells short copy”. The answer is a psychological glitch that affects the way people make decisions from day to day. I never read that explanation before.
And now, before I went to bed I read this post which just blew my mind. I saw your Bill Mays style video and thought to myself “Yeah, Rich had to do this after he wrote the article on Bill Mays”, it didn`t really annoy me. It felt weird because it was different, but that was it. I expected you to return to the old format since most people would be upset about you changing your behaviour. Besides, I didn`t like your pitchvoice.
Never expected that to be part of a split-test. But that`s what succesful marketers do. They test.
And you were right, I read your article, loved the insights, but I didn`t have concrete plans to test what you wrote.
Thanks for the lesson.
Today must be a special day. I learnt two valuable lessons about the way we think and act. Human psychology is a fascinating subject.
The insight I receive from people like you, challenge my believes and force me to change. To grow and move up in life.
Regards,
Tom Vo
your right tom – lots of marketers talk about split tests but truthfully very few actually do (especially on a blog).
but more important than the insights or the lessons is your own applications of what you have been exposed to. so keep thinking about how you can apply it.
the shorter the space and time from being exposed to a new idea and applying it – the better!
rich
Thank you first of all for these insights.
I have to admit, the actual voice style you used was a little like the PT Barnum showstopper announcement.
As I prepare a series of videos for a relaunch, I’ll have to take on board what I have learnt from you.
Really amazing to think how infomercials which are often shown in the dead of night can generate interest from someone who isn’t just groggy from drink!
People won’t admit it, but if a good product is sold on it’s merits with some flair, they will buy. If it is oversold with pure logic and fact, you’ll put people off.
Even this page seems to be unavailable when you first arrive – or is that another split test!
Great to see the scientific method alive and well in new frontiers.
Thanks
Tim
spot on tom!
btw – you can split test anything – blog posts, outsourcers, videos, how you answer the phone, subject lines, etc….
and the business builders who are constantly hypothesizing first and then split testing (to confirm or dispute their hypothesizes) know more than everyone else combined.
rich
Rich,
Testing anything reminds me back years ago when I was in advertising. It was with Verizon, and everyone in advertising would call on clients saying, “I handle your advertising account with Verizon.”
Well, at the end of an ad campaign, when they wanted to squeeze in as much revenue as possible, they would open up all accounts so anyone could call on them. First thing I did was look at all the big money accounts that weren’t mine, and I called on them. BUT I tried something different.
I called them up and said, “I’m a marketing consultant with Verizon, and I’m here free of charge to help you with your business. It’s something I do for special clients like yourself. I’ve taken some time to look at your ads and your competitors a bit, and was wondering when we could sit down so I can share what I uncovered for you.”
I was able to in large part, using that little shift in presenting myself, increase ad revenue 137% to objective in Washington, DC immediately after the 9-11 attacks.
Maybe not a TRUE split test, but there’s no question putting a different label on myself, introducing myself in a different way – something no one else thought of “testing” made a huge difference.
TREMENDOUS post again Rich. You always deliver the goods.
Mark
A couple of things as a technical note
1. If you are serving full content in your RSS feed, it is a little more complicated split testing video if video also appears in your feed. (not applicable in this case, Rich has partial feed)
2. If you are using PHP for split testing video, you can end up invalidating your page cache on each page load.
3. I am not sure whether I am typical, but I grow very lazy filling in opt-in boxes on sites I am already signed up for.
Often you don’t even gain any additional response or new autoresponder sequence to reward for taking new action
Was there any difference in opt-in rate for new visitors who had only seen the new video, and not browsed other posts, compared to if someone had seen both the Billy Mays article, and the new video (Rich Mays version)?
I didn’t spot the split test, but as per comment on previous post, your video would have attracted a different demographic.
Andy Beard is right. While the other video may have have had a higher conversion rate could it be because you were talking in a style that is appealing to people who need that louder, more in your face pitching that would be used in an info-merical?
That’s exactly what that style is good for, getting you to take action right now. However, how long or often can we stand that pitching style? How often will I come back to view the content of someone using that style? For me, not often. That’s why I follow Rich.
I lent my ETR Info-Marketing Bootcamp to another marketer and kept on tell’em how they have to listen to Rich. The next day she asked me “Is he the one with that monotone voice?” Up till that point I hadn’t realized that when Rich presents it’s so calm compared to others. I understood then how focused in on your content, not how you deliver. As a matter of fact, if you were delivering it Billy May style like the test video that converted so many more.
Testing is a must and this whole article illustrated that very well, especially since I was one of those that commented. However, these results could be very decieving. Will those opt-ins that you wouldn’t have converted go deeper in your funnel after they see you normal style, the real you that your loyal followers are attracted to?
This is John sited in the article. I said “I know that you’re pitching in this video… I twinged at hearing you at such a high pitch. ”
Rich, this is a great post. I have only been online for a few months, and up until recently I have just trusted people and haven’t split tested anything. But I just entered a new niche, and I am starting a massive campaign, so I decided to try out my hand at split testing.
I have seen many people claim they have very high converting optin pages (Jeff Johnson’s for his SEO software, Ryan Deiss’s Reverse Reverse Optin – the one used for the Opportunity.com, Mass Control and a few others, Eben Pagan’s Double Your Dating optin page – he actually has a few, Russell Brunson’s Micro Continuity optin pages, Tellman Knudson’s optin pages) and I have no idea which one converts best. So what I have done is I created an optin page copying the style of each of those supposedly high converting and I even watched as many videos as possible explaining the elements of the page and why they convert well (so I could make sure I actually keep the components that make the pages convert well) and I have set it up to test each of the pages so I can see which one converts the best with my copy, and with my niche – I am sure it actually depends on the niche.
I am also setting up a different optin…page to test my own style (sort of copied from some of Joe Lavery’s stuff…can you tell I watch a lot of marketers?)
I know that the split testing will pay off (I have a guess as to which ones will win, but you never know!)
I loved your Billy May’s post, and I actually changed a video I made for my campaign. :) This post has also been very valuable, as now I have a bunch more things I have decided I need to split test that I wasn’t going to.
Thanks Rich!
Shawn
Rich:
Two things.
First, there is no comfort zone for true business owners. Likewise, it’s false statement to say that there is a safe zone. Safe and comfortable… yeah, that spells doom.
Here’s why…
If a business in a highly competitive niche falls into a comfort zone or stable pattern, that business will be KILLED.
Simply put, the comfort zone is a temporary waiting point — the point where a business sits and waits to be killed. It’s not a place to spend 20 years pulling profit.
Lesson: Entrepreneurs rarely have cash cows that last long. Competitors slay ‘em.
That’s why the comfort zone is a death zone. True entrepreneurs should never be in a comfortable position. And, this is true even if they are ONLY competing with themselves. (Different topic for a different time.)
Let’s keep pluggin’ here…
“Founders understand that success is a journey, not a destination.” — Yes, and it’s not comfortable journey. That’s really my second point.
Business ain’t meant to be a Sunday afternoon drive on the old back roads with Grandma.
If you feel that you’ve made it, it means that you’re likely going to fail soon without knowing what hit you.
Mark my words –
Soon, you’re going to soon be rolling on the floor in agony, like someone punched you in the balls unexpectedly.
** Ouch. **
Feeling 100% successful is a good sign that you’re about to get crushed. That’s when you know you’ve become lazy and dull. That’s when the competition jumps over you. That’s when they laugh at you. That’s when the gov’t comes in and seizes everything because you stopped paying attention to your business.
Balls. Punched. Rolling on floor.
But I digress. And, that’s enough ball punching for today…
Great post, as usual.
~ John S. Rhodes
p.s. You need a better display system for reading your notes in your video. I can see your eyes move back and forth, back and forth. It’s like you’re watching a tennis match. Hell, maybe I’m being an ass. I just thought you might wanna know.
Rich,
I agree with split testing and I’m a big fan of doing this. For most people
everything is easy in theory but frankly I believe they don’t do it because
either is too time consuming or they don’t know how to do it.
But in the end the results will pay off…
BTW, the footer ad is nice but it’s too long for my screen. So practically it’s impossible to close it because I don’t see the button and there is no horizontal scroll bar.
Valeriu
Good point Rich.
I disagree with the negative comments here.
I have to say that I did not really read everything before watching to 2 videos and I really tought that the first was alot better :)
I even believe that the second one was a test !
@John Rhodes : alot of entrepreneurs struggle because they are repeating again and again the same actions without noticing that they doesn’t produce results anymore. For me you are describing a romantic entrepreneurs picture but most of them/us have some stability somehow.
I’ve got to admit that for the past few years I have not really understood why you have had so many raving fans.
I’ve got to admit that I have not been one of them… until now.
This is easily one of the most powerful blog posts that I have read in a very long time.
Cheers
Jesse
This is a really interesting and useful application of split testing that I have never used. I guess I might say “oops”, but that would be an understatement after seeing what you’re showing here.
Thanks for opening up new ideas to me.
Warmest,
Jonathan
http://www.ThreeMoneyMethods.com
Wow Rich,
I have to admit I usually HATE reading long blog post, but for some reason I just kept wanting to read this one!
Thanks for content, Rich
Alex Lim
Maybe in the next post, you can give detail step to split testing, i want to learn to test my web and thank for the explanation.
David
very interesting. I did not thought that thuch a little difference in argumentation and presentation could become such a difference in the results.
Perfect post at rite time
Great post Rich,
Now here will be the real test that matters, “Which one makes you more money?” A trap many marketers run into is looking at the opt-in rate and not the net revenues. So if one test gets you 42% more opt-ins are those people the buyers? Since the rest of the message was the same and we are only talking about the “delivery” of the message, will it equate into a better net. Now I’m guessing it will, but please let us know if the end result is equal or there is a difference. Also, since these people responded to a more “pitchy” tone, will you follow up with those people in the same tone or the more subdued tone? I would suggest testing that separately too would be highly valuable.
Once again – great post!
Well, have to look into that later today.
Thanks for the post.
I agree with Bill above (and I am sure you see it the same way Rich) that the bottom line, the customer lifetime value is the ultimate test factor. I know it’s hard to do a quick test for longterm effects. But nothing is won by attracting a ton of notorious non-buyers or customers you don’t like.
Referring to Frank Kern’s thinking I am asking you, Rich, “What does make you feel better? What is more congruent with yourself? Do you like to be the guy in video ‘A’?”
I could write more, … but have serious work to do elsewhere. Just wanted to drop you a line.
Yours
John
Hey John… I think entrepreneurs need to be VERY careful when applying the mindset of “what makes me feel better” to their marketing and business-building efforts. Because, not everything that makes us “feel better” is the best for our business.
In many instances, what makes us “feel better” is the exact opposite of what we should be doing. We all, certainly, have examples of that in our lives. I know I do. :-)
Good point Todd….And one that goes beyond business.
Rarely does a really intense workout make an athlete feel better at that moment. The payoff comes later.
A great dessert tastes better than lettuce to most people, but eating to feel good at the moment – if the norm – leads to obesity. Not a goal that most want.
Interestingly though, over time, the really intense workout will seem a bit more fun because of the payoff. And so will that salad. And so will trying something different in business for all of us.
There’s a difference between trying to BE someone you’re not, and doing something that’s a little bit of stretch for you.
Rich,
To very quickly jump past the take aways from the article, which everyone has covered very well, and ask the question that sticks with me… how do you define, “calculated risk”?
You mentioned that founders have a way of calculating the risk, and I’m curious if you have an insight into the variables of a risk calculation for an internet entrepreneur.
Thanks,
PJ
Maybe they opted in because they wanted you to shut the heck up.
Some may have converted in spite of what you’d done, because they knew that you’re not typically like that.
This test, in itself, proves very little.
The only way this test is valid is if the viewers had no prior exposure to you.
Hey Robert… thanks for the comment. You don’t really think someone would opt-in on a webpage to stop someone from speaking on a video they pressed play to listen to, do ya? Wouldn’t just hitting the back button on their browser or the stop button be more likely? ;-)
Matter of fact, that’s PRECISELY what I did on the video produced by the guy you’ve been promoting recently, Tom something or other?
That video was so gawdawful boring that I took the next action to shut him up. The ONLY reason I opted in was because you recommended it.
Frank Kern, he is not.
If this was the first time I’d seen him without your endorsement then yes, click/close.
I think it would be unwise to pretend that this “pitch” took place in a vacuum.
Where on earth is written you should advertise or promote a product in a particular way? Testing is the way to go. And in today’s digital world, where producing a different version of something is almost free, is really a nonsense not to do it.
Rich once again, you’re setting examples on how to do things in Direct Marketing for today’s world.
My call to all of you IM’s is to check out these books, I’m sure you’ll get something (actually I think a lot) out them, and with a truly low investment.
Predictably Irrational by Dan Ariely (behavioral economics). You’ll learn really interesting stuff about our behaviour that you can use in your marketing efforts.
Influence: The Psichology of Persuasion by Robert Cialdini (Rich’s recommendation) A truly eye opener.
Getting Everything You Can Out of All You’ve Got by Jay Abraham. This should be required reading for ever Internet Marketer.
Most of Rich’s moves you can identify them in Jay Abraham’s book.
Preeminence – Testing – Unique Selling Proposition – Geometrically Growing your business – etc. The Internet chapter is dated, but the rest of book is worth …. (fill in the blank with whatever you think you want to earn) an you can get it from amazon for under 12 bucks!! The book is really a Gem.
How To Get Ideas by Jack Foster. If you think you’re not creative, if you think you can’t get new ideas. Read this book and you’ll learn a method to do so. BTW, at the end of the book it gives the key to success: PERSISTENCE.
Ken Valenzuela
I
Rich,
I hope the politicians don’t see this! (hee hee)
Great stuff. So often people espouse a theory and never bother to live it or test it. It speaks volumes when someone says “X is the way to do it” and then split tests his normal way with X and shows that indeed X is the way to do it.
Following up Rich on my biggest takeaway. With video being so easy to do – there are so many things to test on a video such as:
1) The player and codecs
2) Auto-play or play by click only
3) The scripts (which you can test endlessly- why not test a longer version – a shorter version – different calls to action, etc)
4) The cropping of the video
5) The setting (Same message with a different background)
6) Hosting (I bet this would have huge impact on results )
7) The Talent – who is the right person to deliver the message
8) And as you’ve demonstrated clearly, the delivery by the talent.
All this just with video. We’ve tested and continue to test several of these types of things, so it’s nice to see a dramatic impact possible with just one change from a very savvy marketer that already has a lot of things going right. That’s a huge lift and I wasn’t demeaning it, but I know you’ll be watching the end result too.
Perhaps people can come up with other video things to test, would be a nice list to accumulate!
I’ve forwarded this post to a few. This is the best thing I’d read on internet marketing for a while.
I would be VERY interested to see a follow-up on the ultimate conversion rates between the two approaches.
Unlike some of the comments from those that felt that Video “A” was somewhat abrasive, I wasn’t put off by it at all.
I feel that we have become accustomed to this type of marketing on TV, and that Billy Mays & Anthony Sullivan, and other personalities like them, have laid the groundwork to use it marketing products online.
This is no different than using copywriting techniques from direct-mail, and using those strategies in online marketing.
Rich, it’s so funny that you actually did this test. It proves something that I’ve noticed in email marketing, too.
What I’ve noticed is that I’ll get emails from people (that I always open, by the way), and they seem so full of hype. But, these are also always the same people that end up on the leader boards for sales, too!
It’s not impossible to be “low key” but effective – Frank Kern proves that. However, you have to be smart enough (like Frank is) to know how to incorporate the triggers that produce sales in your low key approach.
So, I guess it all really comes down to knowing the psychological triggers and how to use them effectively. And, like it or not, in video, one of the triggers comes down to energy and presentation style – something that MANY of us struggle with.
Another key factor that comes into play in video is being able to get to the point quickly. Notice that your 2nd video is almost 5 minutes longer than the 1st video… yet you are presenting the exact same info! I’m sure many people did not stick around for the whole 12 minutes.
I’m sure if you redid the 2nd video, without all the pauses, and with more energy, you’d get results that were more inline with the 1st video. AND, you’d do so without having to totally change your personality.
Thanks for the great info!
~Mari Ann
I’d be careful how you interpret those results. Many people, including myself simply received version A first, and thus opted in there….had you not had a reputation from before, I would have probably just closed the browser window.
Bottom line: there are confounding factors in this “study”. ie: X does not necessarily imply Y, since you did not isolate for other possible factors that could have influenced your result.
But, keep experimenting…..good attempt.
Hey Nandi (and Robert)… thanks for sharing your comments and insights. You guys are both obviously passionate marketers. But, there are a few points that need some clarification:
1. Thousands and thousands of website visitors were exposed to each of the videos discussed above via a simultaneous split-test. I share this so you understand that we had well-beyond the number of actions necessary to make this a statistically valid test.
2. Each visitor was exposed to only one of the videos (thanks to a cookie) and was given the same exact call-to-action: to opt-in (our desired outcome). Of course, you know, this is how a proper split-test is conducted.
3. Version A, the one Rich did Billy Mays-style, out-performed Version B by 42%. In other words, Version A generated 42% more opt-ins than Version B did… with the same exact quantity of viewers. In the direct response marketing world, this is a LANDSLIDE. In fact, Google – in their Website Optimizer system – regularly shows the winner of a split-test with as little as a 10% improvement (less than 1/4th the improvement we saw in this test with Rich’s Billy Mays-style video).
Frankly, to say Version A simply outperformed Version B would be a gross understatement… similar to saying a 42% increase in your income is only a slight increase. Or, to say a landing page that generates 42% more opt-ins than another page is only a slight improvement in that page’s performance. That’d be absurd, right? Of course.
4. Since this was a test to simply see which video would produce the greatest number of opt-ins, and NOT a test to see which would produce a higher lifetime value or more sales, the results are conclusive. Again, you always need to keep in mind what you’re testing for, what’s your desired outcome, and what the results prove and don’t prove.
Lastly, don’t make the mistake many novice, newbie marketers make: reaching to find some reason to disagree or doubt the results of a statistically proven test simply because it goes against your opinion or brings you out of your comfort zone.
Remember – as an entrepreneur, you owe it to yourself and your business to do what works best for your company… and NOT what you’re most comfortable with or what your opinion dictates. Assumptions and opinions have no place in direct response marketing. That’s the beauty of what we do… we get to PROVE everything with tests and data. And that’s exactly what we did here.
Hope that clears things up for ya,
Todd Brown :-)
P.S. Think of it like this… would you be happy if your website got 42% more traffic because of one change you made? :-)
I totally agree with Nandi here, since it was the first thing that came in mind when reading Rich’s post above. Thanks for your rational mind Nandi, more of this please! Inger
I think all things were NOT equal on the split test of the videos. The reason you got a better response may have simply been because the un-hyped version was almost five minutes longer! Might be worthwhile to test videos of equal length next time.
I’m baffled that no one has mentioned the video length!?!?!? Do you have any data on how many people left before the video ended? And opt-in percentage when the video was seen completely?
Hey seomaster… thanks for your comment. Video B was longer simply because the content was delivered at Rich’s normal pace. Regardless of the length of either video, though, the test results are still conclusive that Video A slaughtered Video B. The reason is irrelevant. In fact, we’re not saying it was specifically because of the Billy Mays-style. But, we are saying that Video A out-performed the normal (longer) Video B on the split-test, regardless of the reason why (i.e. length of one video, hand-motions, Rich’s white T-shirt).
The purpose of sharing these test results were not to tell you to go out and imitate Billy Mays in your next video. Absolutely not.
The purpose of sharing these results was so that you can see TWO CRITICAL points:
1. Just because something is comfortable to you doesn’t mean it is the best thing for your business. In fact, many times… as seen with these test results… the thing you are most uncomfortable with might just be the best thing for your business.
2. Your opinion and the opinions and feelings of others shouldn’t determine how and what you do with your company marketing. What should determine what you do is testing data. The data doesn’t lie. It’s not subjective.
Hope that helps ya,
Todd Brown :-)
Todd,
Your “data” isn’t subjective, but your interpretation of it is flawed.
See my comment below.
Doc Williamson
Hi Todd,
I think it’s fair to say that there are many other variables that influenced the response rate from the videos including enthusiasm, choice of words, confidence and tone. Those factors can only be tested fairly if tested individually.
Rich definitely opened up the conversation about the testing factor, which I appreciate immensely. Hey, if we are willing to test many headlines and copy for our sales letters, why wouldn’t we test the content and tone for our videos?
I think that’s the real point. Thanks again for pushing our curiosity.
Wow must say it was different to hear Rich in video A. But can’t really say how I would have reacted had I not been a client of Rich’s. I find it really interesting though that it made such a difference in the amount of opt ins. Hmmm definately thought provoking about stepping out of our own box. Definately a good example of why testing is so important and how our own assumptions could be so wrong. I love it!
and for the comment above about Tom Mc Carthy being boring, well maybe it is just his mannerisms you did not like, do what Rich suggests and speed up the video to about 150%. It seems most of us are so used to be over loaded with info that when it is presented in a slower more personal mannerism we tend to get bored. But, my feeling is that Tom is just not used to our crowd yet and his course is going to change lives. So I personally am in and encouraged as I believe he will over deliver in every way he can as that appears to be his personality to me. Not easy to teach those who have all ready had 100’s of hours of training. But I am behind him 100%. Big Hugs Tenderspirit
Hey Rich.
Setting aside anything that people may think negatively about Video A (I personally liked it, but I was a huge Billy Mays fan as well), it held my attention much better. Moreover, you structured it in a way that presented the problems or questions up front. Then, you chipped away at revealing the solutions to the problems. It’s an excellent strategy to motivate people to listen to you and buy into whatever you are promoting. Video A is a lot of “sizzle”, but it’s not ONLY sizzle – there’s the meat to back-up the sizzle. We named our business “Maverick” because we are helping business owners use non-traditional methods to market their business. Video A inspired me to go to the next level with what we teach our business owners. Thanks for a great video.
I’ve heard this from several people, the original source was either Jeff Paul or John Carlton…
“You can’t bore people into buying from you.”
Especially, in our “short attention span society” marketers need to use techniques that GRAB PEOPLE’S ATTENTION.
I have a low key personality, like yours Rich, but I am constantly striving to “up the energy” in the audios and videos I create.
When I think I’m at an 8 or 9, I get feedback that says I’m really at a 6. So, it may be uncomfortable… but marketing (especially a sales “pitch”) is not about how you feel, but how your audience feels and what will get them to take action.
Billy Mays succeeded in short hard-hitting ads for stuff like spot remover or mops. That worked because the ads were short. His approach isn’t well-suited to your longer 15 minute minimum ads about a product that is a bit more complex than a mop.
Tim,
Thanks for lot of thought provoking videos, and just plain ideas about marketing but in this case you are just dead wrong. (no pun intended).
Billy Mays know which products he could sell and which he could not. He made a lot of money making good choices.
In your case, however, I am afraid that you have misinterpreted the data. I don’t doubt that the Billy Mays (obnoxious) huckster style drew more response, but you overlooked an obvious correlation that corresponded to that difference.
The “content” was nearly exactly the same in terms of the words and sentences used, but the “high energy” (to put it nicely) version was a little over 7 minutes and the NICE (usual) Rich style content was over 12 minutes. The increase in response reported was about 42% right. Go ahead, do the math yourself. The difference in LENGTH of the videos was very close to exactly 42%. The longer video drew less responses not entirely due to the differences in delivery/style, it was almost certainly a function of the “drop” rate. Check your servers. I am fairly confident you will find that is true.
Rich, I LIKE your style. I like that you are not some cheap huckster out to squeeze a buck out of every passing Tom, Dick and Mary. The “real” you is what people really want in the long run, and you’ve been delivering that. Please don’t spoil what you’ve got for a transient “bump” in your response rate. Or at least if you insist on exploiting the exploitable, please pick a separate niche, don’t sully your reputation here.
Thanks
Sincerely,
Stafford “Doc” Williamson
Doc,
I would agree that the length of time would effect the result, but by simply following that logic that there was a 42% difference simply based on time, a 10 second video that simply said “Fill out my damn form” would crush the both the A/B versions Rich tested. And one that said” Fill out” would beat “Fill out my damn form” by 60 %. (Hey maybe we can get a 350% opt-in rate) Then – one could say – just put an opt-in without any headlines, bullets, call-to-action, video, etc – would get the best response.
I’m not discounting the time aspect, in fact it may have more impact than the delivery style, but I think delivery style is what ultimately was the big driver in the lift (IMHO). The thing to watch is how he follows up moving forward. What he has a real opportunity to do here is segment his list and carry through the testing at multiple touchpoints in the follow up process. I raised this question about segmenting follow up at one of his Live Events, some of the marketers like Rich believe it has huge potential. Others, like Frank Kern, thought you should simply talk to the core of your target customer.
I imagine most people will take the high-level view of this lesson as “make my pitch with more Billy Mays energy and I’ll get a bump in conversion.” But if one is marketing to a big enough group where the cost of testing to gain reasonably expected conversion bumps that will materially affect the the bottom line would seem worthwhile, the learning from this post should be applied and tested throughout the marketing life cycle.
And yes, the time of message should be tested too. Why say blah, blah when you can just say blah?
Heck, I guess I just should have said, “Doc, testing time, good idea!”
Way to go Rich! Another excellent reason why are successful. Not because you are super-special but because you are open to change and try new things. Name of the game is testing. Thanks for the insight!
Oh, and in response to many posters…the purpose of being in business is NOT to be liked. Of all things available, business is one of the worst ways to sooth low self-image. Too much crushing defeat and failure. If making friends and feeling good were the purpose, the entrepreneur crowd would be drastically different.
No, business is about building. It’s about money. Creating. Value. Friendships, good feelings, and even good will are byproducts (fine if they come). If this change were to give you a momentary spike but undermine in the long-term, then it’s a bad decision. But if it is a lasting growth then the purpose of business has been satisfied. And who cares if a few people don’t like you.
What showmanship and variance in delivery of message for the two video presentations Rich totally awesome. I for one was used to the camera delivery from the inside of the affiliate/product owners car. Seen a lot of those and seen how busy the traffic was in their home town. Still I did not give my email or buy the product. I think Howie Swatze face sells and he doesnt shoot video from his vehicle or yell at the camera. What I am saying is if you display confidence to the camera via voice ie emphasis, modulation etc clear logic and overall cool calm relaxed body language ie Howie Swatze , Frank Kern, Mike Filsaime you get opt-ins simple as that.
this is a very excellent tips! i enjoyed reading your article and very glad.. yes, its nice to try new things on your on and thats make you special on your on way.. thanks again!
Hi Rich, Todd and You,
besides the facts of video lengths and presentation style one measurable difference in the videos is the speed at which Rich speaks.
The faster presentation is requiring more concentration to follow and therefore you don’t get bored or distracted as easily. Furthermore the comprehension is higher.
Rich himself is stating these facts and other advantages when it comes to accelerated learning. (I once bought the Software FasterAudio through the Strategic Profits affilate link but couldn’t find it now as a reference. It’s an awesome tool, bring it back to your portfolio).
Sideeffects of speaking faster are:
* shorter videos, with same copy
* inreased modulation of the voice (more lifely (variations in pitch and loudness) instead of monotonous)
* higher emotional input of the speaker
The value of emotion in copy comes to mind.
Modulation, emotional speach, and proper articulation are the main factors to make listening a bliss. Remember the good night stories in childhood?
Speaking faster, more emotional, with modulation and properly articulated can be done without becoming a pitchman. In fact every good story”teller” is one because he uses these tools. He uses these tools to tell a story and is liked for that. No need to pitch.
I suggest the following split-tests:
1. Using the *same* video but one with manually inreased speed of 130% to 150 %. Wait, the Video A was around 40% shorter, that means we are well in this range with the tested videos. BTW hide the controls on the player ;-)
2. Doing two different videos one normal, one with extreme modulation at the same speed.
3. You know the rest…
Let me know your thoughts
Karl c]:-)
PS: To speed up the videos you watch: Quicktime allows to spead up, hit Ctrl + K. For flash content and PC you can use a plugin by
Rich,
I could see why your results vere like you said that video #1 was more responsive.
I listened to both videos and I can tell you that video #1 kept my interest a lot
longer and kept me focused.
Rich,
One word: awesome.
Like someone else above said, for some reason you’ve never resonated with me–until NOW.
I’m a huge fan of Jay Abraham and that’s why I’m on your list. But this post was incredible. Just turned some of my assumptions upside-down.
Thanks for reinforcing the lesson that marketers should always test–and did it in a way that actually makes it very real, and not a cliche’ that everyone spouts but doesn’t actually follow through on because, in our arrogance, we sometimes secretly think we know better than the market.
Regards,
Dan
There’s another powerful message in this example: “What you hear” from your customers can obscure reality. Your customers’ comments suggested that the “Billy Mays” video failed. Had you listened only to those comments and ignored the data, you could have made a costly mistake. But you looked at the data and knew the truth.
The comments we hear on our blogs and in social media typically reflect 1-5% of the community on a given site. Research shows that clearly. This is why we need more systematic data–such as split tests and surveys–to REALLY tell us what our customers think and want.
Hey Jeanne… you are totally on the money! Kudos for being savvy enough to realize what you shared. :-)
Rich,
Very interesting split test!
So, how will you use the results? What will change?
Will you now adopt the pitchmen style?
I agree with some of the other comments, that the split test – while interesting and surprising, is a little tricky on how to interpret the results and what actions to take from it.
Will be interested to see your next video… :)
Howard
I feel very hard to make business with Strategi profit. I wish to join but no way to get involve and i am very sure to get benifit from it how.
Best regards
Sovannarith
Hey Rich, Loved the post!
One interesting point that you are leaving out though (that you might want to look into) is how many of your current subscribers will leave based on video A.
I know it’s more of a sales video, so other videos might not be the same. But if people grew to know your style as being what they cling too – and then you change it… you can’t just weight the upfront boosts.
It would have to be the upfront boost, vs. the drops from behind.
Either way, I liked the contrast in videos. Something I need to implement into my marketing! Also, (since I’m actually involved in this market… a customer of it) I got to see the side of the story that I never got to see in Billy Mays product lines.
By having the up beat tempo (I also watched the videos backwards.. your old style..then the billy mays style), I was excited, my blood was pumping, and I was thrilled to do whatever you said. Even though I already knew what you were going to say, and the entire content of the video.
I didn’t get that the first time when watching the old style of content delivery. Very interesting, because that’s a take away I could never have when watching Billy Mays sale pitches. (unfortunately I was never a target customer of his… /sadface)
-Derek
Hi Todd and Rich,
I am surprised by the results.
Different famous speakers are known to “hypnotize” their audience like the Reverend Jessie Jackson. So perhaps this is along the lines of what happened when you did things Billy’s style? When comparing the 2 styles it is easy to discern that there is indeed some sort of repetitive tone that cycles repetitively which keeps one attention “perked up.”
Interestingly enough this hypnosis (if that’s what’s happening) has SERIOUS financial implications to ones own wallet ;)
So now here’s the $1 million dollar question…
Given that this style converts higher, are all of your videos going to be done in Billy’s style? Or will you try to create a hybrid more personalized version to you and split test that version too?
Best,
Justin
Lets hope it was a genuine and sincere split test of a result for the benefit of learning something that wasn’t obvious – and not only a way for Rich to make more money?
Inger
I have to be honest and say that I was surprised to find out that Video A worked best for sign-ups. And, I am very grateful to be a part of this evolving process as you move forward and share the results with us. I believe that it has saved me from making the error of staing in a comfort zone, doing, implementing and testing.
I am looking forward to the rest of this series with enthusiasm.
Rich great info.
You hit the nail on the head (for me) when you talk about being in the “comfort state” I know for a fact this is a Dream Killer.
Again thank you for sharing.
God Bless
I have to mention that, while I do not specifically recall which of the videos I was exposed to, I must say that your results do indeed indicate the Billy Mays’ style call to action to be effective, yes. It is worth noting, however, that even where visitors may have felt uncomfortable – commenting to that affect – there is another variable in play here . . . that of visitors’ past exposure to you and their pre-video-view preconceptions of you. Even some who commented implied a ‘lack of believability’ with respect to your altered style of presentation.
This is not an attempt to complicate the matter; but, I will suggest that your pre-established credibility, authority and delivery of discernable value for many visitors served to ‘push them’ beyond the discomfort they associated with the recognized-as-inconsistent delivery style. To do so, I believe that the weighted value assigned to you by them essentially affected within some a ‘need to forgive you’ for what may have been perceived as a temporary error in your judgment. I believe that it is the base of established respect for you that, combined with Billy’s ‘interruptive, in-your-face’ style that served as a multivariable catalyst that explains a significant portion of the increased the opt-in rate.
If one were to inaccurately conclude that this were an effective style for them to employ, should my proposition be remotely plausible, they could effectively destroy their true, effective persona as currently perceived by their stakeholders – unless, of course, what they promote by such means is condicive to ‘hawking.’ [No offense intended]. While this single test would point to enhancing the specific opt-in, I also believe that if you were to adopt Billy’s delivery style permanently, I am inclined to think that you would forfeit business volume over time as people came to ‘believe’ such change to be genuine.
I have not written this in opposition to any of your express thoughts. It is simply an observation.
I enjoy the critical thinking that you invoke on a regular basis. Thank you to Rich and the SP Team.
I completely agree about the comfort zone. In one of my favorite fiction books an old experienced wizard tells his apprentice: “You should do every day at least one thing you don’t like, just for the practice.” And I am trying to follow that rule too. Cannot say, it’s easy though…
As to the split test, I am using controversy to raise interest all the time. My most popular blog posts are full of negative comments, sometimes addressed by readers to each other, so that I even have occasionally interfere and moderate to keep conversation civilized.
Primary thing is to get people emotional, even negative emotions work, of course, within a reason. Sometimes negative comments make the rest feel antagonized to the commenter and side by side with you. Also, when emotions are involved, people “get it” much better and remember the content much better.
So, great post as usual. Thank you!
Hey Rich,
I don’t know if anyone has mentioned this or not.
But my first impression when looking at the two videos was that you were very obviously reading from some sort of teleprompter script in the second video… and you weren’t in the first.
When the viewer notices that your reading (which I did immediately in the second video) it’s an immediate turn off. Its distracting and it makes the message less genuine.
I didn’t notice you reading in the 1st (Billy Mays) video. I therefore felt that the message was much more genuine, regardless of your delivery style.
Just my 2 cents.. but thats a seperate variable that you’d need to control to conduct an 100% accurate split test.
Hey Rich,
Good post. I remember thinking while watching your video (the Bill Mays imitation) He’s talking a little more pitchy, he doesn’t need to do that, I’ll do what he says anyway. But I just looked at both videos today and I thought, goodness, video B is boring and long. I guess Bill Mays was right, enthusiasm in necessary.
Arriving home bleary eyed after editing my first video for a micro-continuity DVD series, I was stopped in my tracks by Rich’s Billy Mays split test. Wish I’d seen this a couple of weeks ago… My niche is in the interior design world, so the “fast and cheap” video strategy would not show the quality of the final product I’m offering (something to test?). I’m not in the position to re-shoot my video squeeze and upsell to test a “Mays” style offer… but it’s certainly food for thought. Maybe my next go at it I’ll do a couple of versions to test. Still, when establishing my “Maven” style, I just gotta be me.
Thanks for keeping me on my toes Rich!
Jan Davidson
Wow! Rich! Just Wow!!
No wonder Billy’s the greatest pitchman of the century!!
Because although you didn’t even exploit the principles of
1. The WOW Demonstration
2. A Cascade of “Yes!! Yes!!”-answer questions
3. Effortless Benefits
4. The Sinatra Test
5. Eliminate Alternatives
6. Starting to improve the deal as soon as you call to action
7. Sweetening the deal with Value and Urgency
to their fullest… video A still just BUTCHERED video B!!!!
I know it’s not reasonable to expect anyone to exploit all of Billy’s vital few tactics to their fullest at the first try. After all, Billy dedicated his life to excellent pitching.
But you’re on the right trail Rich- the one blazed so well by Billy! Even a hint of Billy Mays (concentrated, carefully directed powerful confident emotions) is confirmed to work wonders!!!
I admire you so much Rich, for your willingness to go way out of your comfort zone just for the sake of improving yourself and your business.
It doesn’t take a shrink to see you were still a little bit timid (as you said, TIMID is the last thing you could call Billy on stage), a little bit nervous and way out of your comfort zone.
Still, you did a great job at your first trial! Congratulations Rich! Just Congratulations!
Way to go!!
PS: I’m posting the Mind Map I did of your “monumental” Billy Mays tribute here as well (the one I posted to your Billy Mays post as a comment), just in case you wanna take a look. Seeing all that very simple but JUST VITAL info “at a glance” helps me (and will help me) beyond my wildest dreams!! Thanks for everything!!
PS2: Each link is good for 10 downloads. That’s why I posted three of each.
http://rapidshare.com/files/256224376/Billy_Mays.mm
http://rapidshare.com/files/256224530/Billy_Mays.mm
http://rapidshare.com/files/256224650/Billy_Mays.mm
http://rapidshare.com/files/256225203/Billy_Mays.jpeg
http://rapidshare.com/files/256225550/Billy_Mays.jpeg
http://rapidshare.com/files/256226131/Billy_Mays.jpeg
Thanks for the Freemind MindMap, awesome.
Karl
Rich,
I rarely comment on anything I see or hear but today, I must commend you for “shooting me right through my heart” with your post. When I read your statement, ” If your are not progressing daily toward the reality of your dream business and lifestyle, it’s because you’ve trained yourself to honor your comfort zone more than your dreams”, it hit me like a bullet. I actually felt in my soul that this has been my problem all the long.
Thank you for the “kick in the A**”! Keep up your great posts!
BTW, I still like “you” more than your “Billy”!
Hey rich, before i reached the line where you actually reveal which version made the 42% opt in, I had personally bet on version B for the same weird reasons you chalk out later. I must say this test does blow away a lot of misconceptions for online/offline marketers and entrepreneurs. Perhaps, a change in body language once in a while provide a more interesting view for customers, and leads, and get them attached to what could have bought about this change.
Thanks for the tips. BR, Anthony
MySuccessMantra.com
I usualy don’t watch videos. I just listen to them. Your “Loud” video kept me watching the whole time. It was kind of annoying but I was focused on what you were saying. Unlike the other one.
There is a reason why successful people keep doing the same formula all over again with some tweaks.
Getting out of my comffort zone has been big in my biz. And it pays off every time.
I loved your Billy Mays tribute email that I received and your pitch is great too.
I have already implemented some of the techniques from that article on my websites – like how my products will solve a problem, talking to them as an expert (which I am in my niche), added a page linked from the home page – to completely describe my credentials and my true identity.
I will be doing split-testing on my blog posts using Google analytics – it’s so easy and I never thought about split testing before either.
What’s more, I’ve been retailing online for 7 years now Rich! You think I’d have been doing all of this already.
Thanks so much for the last couple weeks of information, it’s changed my thinking and my future business plans. A real breath of fresh air.
And the price tag? FREE!
Well said as I know that this was what allot of people needed to hear:)
Rich
What you’ve experienced here is kinda like ‘tall poppy syndrome’.
When you start to do something really well or different to the norm people start criticizing you.
So as soon as you start to cop flack, you know you’re heading in the right direction.
Kat
Hi Rich
I honestly must say that i am so glad that i had found your website and starting to follow your advice. I have heard of the split testing method before and it never really made sense to me.
Those other internet marketers out there make it so hard to understand.
I just wished that i had listen to you from the start.
Thank you so much rich and Todd.
Best wishes,
Doogs
P.S i will be keeping in touch with your posts and products,
Simply amazing :-)
WOW… I cannot wait for the next seminar featuring the new “Billy” Schefren… he’s riveting!
Seriously Rich… it does work. Now when’s the next ProfitMania event… my bags are packed and ready.
Founders One… coming to you this February… 2010?
Disney is calling… :-)
Hey Rich,
I’ve got to give you props for testing this out the way that you did! Not a lot of people with a following like you would have the guts to contemplate this, let alone follow through with it. Especially given the fact that your marketing personality is a lot different than Mr. Mays. No one can say that you don’t ‘walk the walk’ when it comes to putting yourself out there. I also appreciate the fact that it’s a great example of doing what’s good for the business even though it may not be comfortable for the business owner. Kudos on the great job that you and Todd have done on the videos!
Gerard
Test, Test, Test…. and that bit about being uncomfortable is something I needed to hear again